So controversial question, why are locker rooms same-sex only? (The controversy's coming, don't worry). Get an answer to that question before reading on by the way... Ok, so, I came up with two. Either A) Locker rooms are same-sex because we want to avoid the temptation of staring at the opposite sex in their underoos. OR B) We don't want people who may be sexually attracted to us staring at US in our underoos. So, does the existence of homosexuality mean that our locker-room etiquette needs to be changed? Because unless there's another reason that I'm not thinking of (please correct me), homosexuals break both of those reasons for same-sex only locker rooms. So, perhaps we need to change the policy of public nudity allowed in these locker rooms?

So, I recently read a study that says that a group performs a task better when all the people know who the smartest person in the room is. I'm assuming that people simply tend to give that 'smartest' person the benefit of the doubt, and give them the final word. But, that seems very similar to me to a common corporate structure. A worker gives their boss the final word, right? Maybe not. Not if they truly think they're smarter...or their idea is better. So, question: What is the most effective way of convincing someone they are wrong when they do not respect you as their intellectual superior?